June 30, 2010
!!!ECONOMY!?
Guaranteed asked:
As of July 2008, there are currently 303,824,640 people in the US population.
0-14 years: 20.1%,15-64 years: 67.1%, 65 years and over: 12.7%
Given this information- exclude ages 17 and under, the total number in the population would be lower. Lets deduct 20% for of the population thats 0-14 . Ex.303,824,640 (TOTAL POP.) minus 60,800,000(20% ages 0-14) That leaves 243,024,460 million. Lets estimate to 240,000,000. Keep in mind, this number would be far less if we take in account the people ages 17 and below vice 14 and below. Now, factor in families whose hosehold income is $150,000 and less. That is the target range. We can decrease our total pop numbers to at least 130,000,000 americans 18 and over, or even 21 and over, that makes 150,000 annually or less, and pays taxes. Of those 130,000,000, if the government gave each qualified person $10,000. Thats right only $10,000. Not per houshold, per qualified person. Many will pay their bills, many will go and blow money wastefully. Either way. Banks, credit card companies, private business would thrive from collecting payments from responsible americans. Consumer retail spending would skyrocket from the irresponsible ones, this would also increase demand, which raises supply, and employment. This would cost less than $1.3tr. Thats really inexpensive considering the $700bn to banks that still isnt opening up to credit to borrowers, or the additional $30+ billion to the auto industy, or the latest $800bn thats about to be dashed away as well. Thats totalling about $1.6tr. My plan cost only $1.3tr. Plus it can be tweaked and adjusted. It really puts the fate of our economy in the hands that built the American economic system, the AMERICAN CONSUMER versus CORPORATE AMERICA. Do you guys think this is a better option? What are your economic thoughts?
Your math is way off. Use your computer calculator. A standard calculator doesn’t go that far. Or, you can use mental math if you have that capability. Oviously, Madam M doesn’t.
Vertical Vinyl Siding
As of July 2008, there are currently 303,824,640 people in the US population.
0-14 years: 20.1%,15-64 years: 67.1%, 65 years and over: 12.7%
Given this information- exclude ages 17 and under, the total number in the population would be lower. Lets deduct 20% for of the population thats 0-14 . Ex.303,824,640 (TOTAL POP.) minus 60,800,000(20% ages 0-14) That leaves 243,024,460 million. Lets estimate to 240,000,000. Keep in mind, this number would be far less if we take in account the people ages 17 and below vice 14 and below. Now, factor in families whose hosehold income is $150,000 and less. That is the target range. We can decrease our total pop numbers to at least 130,000,000 americans 18 and over, or even 21 and over, that makes 150,000 annually or less, and pays taxes. Of those 130,000,000, if the government gave each qualified person $10,000. Thats right only $10,000. Not per houshold, per qualified person. Many will pay their bills, many will go and blow money wastefully. Either way. Banks, credit card companies, private business would thrive from collecting payments from responsible americans. Consumer retail spending would skyrocket from the irresponsible ones, this would also increase demand, which raises supply, and employment. This would cost less than $1.3tr. Thats really inexpensive considering the $700bn to banks that still isnt opening up to credit to borrowers, or the additional $30+ billion to the auto industy, or the latest $800bn thats about to be dashed away as well. Thats totalling about $1.6tr. My plan cost only $1.3tr. Plus it can be tweaked and adjusted. It really puts the fate of our economy in the hands that built the American economic system, the AMERICAN CONSUMER versus CORPORATE AMERICA. Do you guys think this is a better option? What are your economic thoughts?
Your math is way off. Use your computer calculator. A standard calculator doesn’t go that far. Or, you can use mental math if you have that capability. Oviously, Madam M doesn’t.
Vertical Vinyl Siding
